Why 2?
We lucky residents of the Pearl of the Pacific
happen to live on the shores of the worlds greatest ocean. Anyone
who has managed to take a little walk along the beach has surely
noticed that the level of the ocean is different at different times
of the day. We were told in elementary school that this phenomenon
is called the tides, and later in high school if we were paying
attention in class, someone probably told us they are caused by the
moon and the sun. Now those of you who are happy to summarize the
US civil war as "the north won" can stop here, but if you want to
know the real scoop on what this tide thing is all about, keep
reading. The central mystery that I want to try to explain is this:
If you observe the beach over a 24 hour period, you will notice
that there are 2 high tides and 2 low tides, not just one of each.
Simple is wrong
Thus clearly the simple explanation of "the
moon pulls the oceans towards it by gravity" is wrong, for as the
earth rotates through the bulge of water, there would only be one
high tide and one low tide each day. Whatever is going on is more
subtle than that. It wasn't until our old friend, Sir Isaac Newton,
came along that we understood what was going on. Here is my
"simplified" version of Newton's key insights. First, if you push
on something, it starts moving in the direction of the push. Newton
called this pushing a "force." This statement may seem obvious, but
like a diamond in the rough, if you chip away at it, its many
facets will be revealed. Let's take a look at some of them.
Consider a bow and arrow:
Vectors - but don't panic
The bowstring is pushing on the
arrow. The top of the string is trying to pull the arrow up towards
the top of the bow. If the bottom half of the string weren't there,
and we released the arrow, the tail feathers would whack the top of
the bow. However, the bottom half of the bowstring is there, and it
is pulling the back of the arrow down towards the bottom of the bow
just as hard as the top part of the string. The net result of these
two forces is what every archer knows, that the forces pulling the
arrow in the vertical direction cancel out, and the arrow winds up
going straight ahead as the bowstring scrapes across your forearm
causing intense pain. The arrow winds up going in the direction of
the the sum of Force 1 and Force 2. We add forces by joining up the
head of one with the tail of the other, and drawing a line from the
original tail to the new head, as above. Okay, armed with this
powerful insight, let's consider the following situation:
We have three masses, called A,B, and C a distance away from
a big heavy object, like the moon, and B is exactly midway between
A and C. Here we need another of Newton's key insights. He
discovered that if two massive objects are near each other, the
"force" (in this case a pull rather than a push) depends on how
much they weigh (how much mass they have) and how far apart they
are. The further apart they are, the weaker the pull. Thus the
moon's pull on C is stronger than the moon's pull on B, because C
is closer to the moon. Similarly, the moons pull on B is stronger
than the moon's pull on A, because A is further away from the moon
than B. This pull will cause A, B, and C to start moving towards
the moon. Furthermore, because the pull on C is stronger than the
pull on B, C will move towards the moon more quickly than B. That
means that after a few seconds the distance between B and C will
increase, because C is moving towards the moon more quickly than B
is. Now exactly the same thing is true about A and B. B will move
towards the moon more quickly than A, because it is closer, so the
distance between B and A will increase. Now watch closely, this is
where the rabbit is pulled out of the hat. Imagine that B is a
giant piece of rock, surrounded by water that extends all the way
out to the ends of A and C. Then, since the distance between B and
C and B and A are both increasing, we would have a picture like
this:
Careful!
Thus as the earth rotates around its axis in 24
hours, it will pass through 2 high tides and two low tides. Have I
convinced you? Well, I'm sorry to say that this explanation is
almost entirely bogus. Even though everything I have said is true,
we have left out a crucial ingredient, namely the force of gravity
that the Earth itself exerts on the oceans. The Earth is so much
closer to the the ocean than the moon, and also more than 81 times
heavier than the moon, that the force that the Earth exerts on the
water is 9 million times stronger than the moon's force. Thus any
lifting of the water that the moon does would be completely
unobservable here on Earth. Would you notice the impact of a fly on
a freight train? Neither would you notice the influence of the moon
on the oceans based on the above argument. So what is really going
on? It brings us back to the bow and arrow and the following
picture:
The real Answer
Things are not as neat as they were before,
but the idea is the same. A is further from the moon than B, which
is further from the moon than C. Thus the force at C is bigger than
the force at B, which is bigger than the force at A. The new
wrinkle is that at A and C, the Earth's gravity exerts a huge force
towards the center of the earth, thus the only "leftover" force
that could move the water is the force that is tangential (lies
completely along the surface of) to the Earth. Thus what matters as
far as the flow of water is concerned, is this tangential force,
and also how things look from the perspective of B, someone sitting
at the center of the Earth. Now look at the arrows in the above
picture. You can see that relative to B, the water at C will flow
down, since the arrow at C is longer than the arrow at B.
Similarly, the water at A will flow up, since the arrow at A is
shorter than the arrow at B. Here is a blown up picture so you can
see what is going on:
Thus
the water at C does indeed flow towards the moon, and bunches
up directly underneath it, while the water at A flows away
from the moon, and bunches up directly underneath it on the
opposite side of the Earth. I told you there was the beauty of
diamonds in that simple little statement of our friend Isaac,
didn't I? Now you know the real scoop, aren't you glad you
know more than just that "the North won?"
Quote of the day:
A is for Apple.
Hester Prynne
Sitemap
Go up to How do Things Work Go up to Home Page of Nadine Loves Henry
Go back to The Calendar Continue with Can I Count on You?